What was PTSD called during World War I?

During World War I, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was referred to as “shell shock.” This phrase described the psychological distress many soldiers experienced due to their exposure to the horrors of battle. Symptoms included dizziness, headaches, fatigue, flashbacks and nightmares that were often indicative of extreme emotional stress. Medical professionals in the early 20th century lacked the understanding of PTSD and thus treated it with little care or consideration. Shell shock victims were simply seen as having a nervous breakdown and were usually sent back into active combat after a brief respite period.

The Evolution of PTSD Terminology During WWI

The terms used to describe PTSD have evolved greatly since World War I. During this era, the mental health affliction was referred to by a variety of phrases with far less clinical accuracy than it carries today. On July 5th, 1919, three British medical officers wrote an article entitled “Shell Shock and Its Lessons” which described the malady as “being a direct reaction to shell explosions or other frightfulness which occurred in the war” – an adequate description at the time but one that completely overlooked any emotional implications of the condition.

One term widely used during WWI to refer to what we now know as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder was “nostalgia” – derived from Greek roots meaning ‘homecoming’ and ‘pain’. However, its traditional connotations implied more of a homesickness than true psychological distress resulting from terrible wartime events like death or injury. By 1916, it had become clear enough for Swiss doctor Oskar Pfister to write about Nostalgic soldiers who displayed symptoms similar yet not identical to those usually associated with PTSD: trembling limbs, nervous exhaustion and insomnia.

At the same time, some clinicians would often label cases of traumatized soldiers as “neurasthenia” – another 19th century term closely linked with hysteria or depression that didn’t always imply trauma suffered in battle specifically but rather was thought to reflect anything that might cause physical fatigue or mental strain. Military psychiatrists often noted moments when veterans would become fixated on their traumatic memories and dubbed such instances ‘war neuroses’, although no broadly-accepted definition of this phrase has ever been established.

Clearly then, while medical professionals acknowledged something unusual happening amongst wounded service men during WWI they were far from effectively diagnosing it using modern terminology related to PTSD. With new methods being developed all over Europe however researchers slowly started gaining better insight into the disorder – changing the face of our understanding forevermore.

Early Descriptions of Psychological Trauma on the Front Lines

As war waged on, soldiers witnessed unimaginable horrors. In the thick of conflict and amidst constant danger, they experienced an unprecedented level of psychological trauma that had never been seen before. While no official term was applied to this psychological suffering during World War I, some doctors and military personnel described it in ways reminiscent of what we now call Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

One physician compared the typical combatant’s experience to a “continuous electric shock”–a relentless barrage of intense emotions connected with life-threatening situations in which soldiers were constantly forced to make split decisions between life and death. Despite early attempts by medical professionals to diagnose the condition, true recognition for the mental strain soldiers endured would not come until decades later.

Another doctor attributed these effects to a “neurasthenia caused by shell shock or exhaustion”–an umbrella term used at the time to indicate general signs of anxiety or distress. A considerable body of literature arose as academics sought to shed light on its implications for individuals on the battlefield as well as broader society when servicemen returned from war service psychologically altered. This eventually paved the way for greater understanding about conditions like PTSD today.

The Emergence of “Shell Shock” as a Diagnosis

At the start of World War I in 1914, physicians and psychiatrists were largely unfamiliar with what would later come to be known as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Consequently, they lacked a clear diagnostic label for the psychological and physiological symptoms that some soldiers were exhibiting due to the intense stress and trauma of warfare. However, throughout the course of the conflict and into its aftermath, a diagnosis began to emerge: “shell shock”.

This term arose to describe military personnel suffering from extreme nervousness or distress which was brought about by exposure to active hostilities. Those affected suffered nightmares, tremors and loss of hearing, speech or sight; experienced extreme anxiety; found difficulty sleeping; startedle easily; had an impaired ability to concentrate; showed signs of disorientation or confusion during combat situations; displayed difficulty controlling emotions, including fits of rage.and could display physical pains such as headaches without obvious cause.

With shell shock often being misdiagnosed as cowardice among military personnel at the time, sufferers sought out help outside of military channels – including within civilian psychiatry – in order to obtain treatment. This ultimately led physicians to better identify the neurological symptoms associated with combat-induced psychological disturbances. Through increased understanding came greater efforts towards mitigating both emotional issues through psychotherapeutic treatments as well improved education amongst veterans on how best deal with PTSD on their return home from war service.

Controversy Surrounding the Term “Shell Shock

Throughout history, the psychological effects of war on service men and women have been largely misunderstood. During World War I, it was referred to as “shell shock”, which implies a physical cause related to being exposed to artillery fire. The use of this term caused controversy due to a lack of understanding that psychological trauma can be just as debilitating as physical injuries.

The misconception around the diagnosis was two-fold: firstly, people did not realize how far-reaching and deep the distress could be; secondly, they believed it only affected men who were directly involved in combat – when in actuality, many noncombatants also experienced shell shock symptoms such as extreme fatigue and irritability. Despite medical professionals at the time advocating for more research into treatment for those suffering from psychological ailments, their advice went unheeded by society and military commanders alike.

Ultimately, this resulted in PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) being used instead of the term ‘shell shock’ after WWI because it does not imply any particular cause – leading to greater public recognition for what veterans may have endured during wartime situations. This shift occurred alongside advances in scientific understandings about mental health issues with an increasing acceptance that victims should receive appropriate medical attention rather than face social stigma or censure from military authorities.

Exploring Alternative Names for Psychological Trauma in Soldiers

With the outbreak of World War I, many military personnel were exposed to traumatic events that had never before been seen in modern warfare. In response, researchers and medical practitioners alike sought to better understand this phenomenon, looking for a more effective way of naming and classifying it than previous terms such as ‘shell shock.’.

One alternative name was ‘battle fatigue,’ a moniker that further distinguished combat-induced psychological trauma from ‘ordinary’ fatigue. This term appeared frequently in official documents up until 1950 when it started to be phased out in favor of the phrase Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The idea behind changing its designation was to emphasize that PTSD wasn’t limited just to war veterans but could affect people who experienced any type of life-altering event.

In recent years though, another phrase has come into use: Operational Stress Injury (OSI). OSI has become an umbrella term for various psychological reactions resulting from military service and conflicts abroad; rather than focusing on one specific condition (as with PTSD), it acknowledges the range of psychological issues soldiers can face in their everyday lives both during and after active duty. As such, OSI recognizes the complexity of how multiple stressors interact with each other – something which is key for creating specialized treatments tailored for individual needs.

The tragic effects of combat-related trauma can extend far beyond what happens on the battlefield. For World War I veterans, one of these long-term consequences was a condition commonly known as “shell shock”, which is now recognized as post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As with modern cases of PTSD, shell shock affected former servicemen in myriad ways and could linger for years or even decades after they had returned home from war.

Because the symptoms of shell shock were largely psychological in nature, treatment often entailed hospitalization and a wide variety of psychiatric approaches ranging from electrical shocks to hypnotism. Despite the large number of men affected by this condition, however, few significant resources were available to adequately address their needs – a problem that continues today for some veterans. A frequent result of inadequate treatment was an exacerbation of symptoms associated with PTSD such as depression, anxiety and substance abuse.

Today’s public discourse has only recently begun to focus more seriously on the lingering mental health challenges faced by many returning soldiers. With increased awareness has come improved access to services such as counseling, veteran peer support groups and medication therapies. Nevertheless, far too many service members have suffered – and continue to suffer – long-term ramifications due to exposure during wartime operations.

Changing Perceptions of PTSD Over Time

Since its emergence during the first World War, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) has been recognised by medical professionals as a serious mental illness that requires dedicated treatment and support. Originally known as ‘shell shock’, what was initially viewed as a physical reaction to war experiences evolved over time into an understanding of psychological trauma.

The use of psychoanalysis in assessing soldiers during WWI revealed deeper underlying issues than just physical manifestations. Mental health workers were able to identify how individual memories had become traumatic for certain soldiers and could begin to link this with wider societal problems like poverty or social exclusion. While research continued throughout WWII it was not until the Vietnam War that PTSD started being seen as both a psychological disorder, as well as one caused by traumatic events such as combat and active service.

As more research is conducted on PTSD, our knowledge continues to grow and evolve, alongside shifting public perceptions of mental health issues in general. This can be seen through initiatives such as Combat Stress which provide advice, support and treatment options for those affected by military-related trauma. We are continuing to learn more about why some individuals respond differently under intense circumstances, allowing us to better understand the condition today and treat it accordingly.

About the author.
Jay Roberts is the founder of the Debox Method and after nearly 10 years and hundreds of sessions, an expert in the art of emotional release to remove the negative effects of trauma. Through his book, courses, coaching, and talks Jay’s goal is to teach as many people as he can the power of the Debox Method. 

© Debox 2022